MS Public Seminar: BRENNA DANIELLE ALBRACHT
When & Where
April 17
11:30 AM - 12:30 PM
UTHealth Houston, McGovern Medical School, MSB B.603 and via Microsoft Teams (View in Google Map)
Contact
- Joy Lademora
- 713-500-9872
- [email protected]
Event Description
The Influence of Scientific, Genetic, and Health Literacy on Carrier Screening Decision-Making
Brenna Danielle Albracht, MS (Advisor: Meagan Choates, MS, CGC)
For those wishing to assess their reproductive risks and make informed decisions in their reproductive planning, carrier screening for autosomal recessive and X-linked conditions, as well as cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening for aneuploidy, are recommended during pregnancy. Despite similarities in purpose, sample requirements, insurance coverage, and safety, a lower percentage of individuals elect carrier screening than cfDNA screening, suggesting there may be a disconnect in what patients perceive as valuable information for their pregnancy. Previous studies have attempted to explain the factors associated with carrier screening uptake or decline; however, no models have yet accounted for a patient’s literacy level in health, genetics, and science. Thus, this study aimed to establish rates of these literacies in a prenatal population and determine whether these literacies were related to carrier screening uptake or informed decision-making. Patients receiving care at UTHealth prenatal clinics were offered a survey consisting of a demographics questionnaire, a modified Multivariate Measure of Informed Choice (mMMIC), and three validated tools each assessing a different literacy: a single question assessing health literacy, the Genetic Literacy and Comprehension (GLAC) measure, and a survey developed by Pew Research to measure scientific literacy. Testing decisions were confirmed via chart review. Health, genetic, and scientific literacy was identified at a rate of 91%, 69%, and 23%, respectively. Carrier screening uptake was 67% in primigravida patients compared to 91% for cfDNA screening and was not found to be associated with literacy. However, informed choice regarding carrier screening (14.7%) was associated with both genetic (MdnI = 14.75, MdnU = 11.33; p < 0.001) and scientific literacy (MdnI = 10.5, MdnU = 4; p < 0.001) as well as with income, education level, and type of insurance coverage (p < 0.001 for all). This study illustrates that higher rates of scientific and genetic literacy, as well as socioeconomic factors, are associated with informed carrier screening decision-making.
Advisory Committee:
- Meagan Choates, MS, CGC, Chair
- Myla Ashfaq, MS, CGC
- Jacqueline Harkenrider, MS, CGC
- Maureen Mork, MS, CGC
- Rachael Newman, MD, MPH
- Claire Singletary, MS, CGC
Joi via Microsoft Teams (Please contact Ms. Brenna Albracht for her Microsoft Teams info.)
The Influence of Scientific, Genetic, and Health Literacy on Carrier Screening Decision-Making
Brenna Danielle Albracht, MS (Advisor: Meagan Choates, MS, CGC)
For those wishing to assess their reproductive risks and make informed decisions in their reproductive planning, carrier screening for autosomal recessive and X-linked conditions, as well as cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening for aneuploidy, are recommended during pregnancy. Despite similarities in purpose, sample requirements, insurance coverage, and safety, a lower percentage of individuals elect carrier screening than cfDNA screening, suggesting there may be a disconnect in what patients perceive as valuable information for their pregnancy. Previous studies have attempted to explain the factors associated with carrier screening uptake or decline; however, no models have yet accounted for a patient’s literacy level in health, genetics, and science. Thus, this study aimed to establish rates of these literacies in a prenatal population and determine whether these literacies were related to carrier screening uptake or informed decision-making. Patients receiving care at UTHealth prenatal clinics were offered a survey consisting of a demographics questionnaire, a modified Multivariate Measure of Informed Choice (mMMIC), and three validated tools each assessing a different literacy: a single question assessing health literacy, the Genetic Literacy and Comprehension (GLAC) measure, and a survey developed by Pew Research to measure scientific literacy. Testing decisions were confirmed via chart review. Health, genetic, and scientific literacy was identified at a rate of 91%, 69%, and 23%, respectively. Carrier screening uptake was 67% in primigravida patients compared to 91% for cfDNA screening and was not found to be associated with literacy. However, informed choice regarding carrier screening (14.7%) was associated with both genetic (MdnI = 14.75, MdnU = 11.33; p < 0.001) and scientific literacy (MdnI = 10.5, MdnU = 4; p < 0.001) as well as with income, education level, and type of insurance coverage (p < 0.001 for all). This study illustrates that higher rates of scientific and genetic literacy, as well as socioeconomic factors, are associated with informed carrier screening decision-making.
Advisory Committee:
- Meagan Choates, MS, CGC, Chair
- Myla Ashfaq, MS, CGC
- Jacqueline Harkenrider, MS, CGC
- Maureen Mork, MS, CGC
- Rachael Newman, MD, MPH
- Claire Singletary, MS, CGC
Joi via Microsoft Teams (Please contact Ms. Brenna Albracht for her Microsoft Teams info.)
", "startDate":"2025-4-17", "endDate":"2025-4-17", "startTime":"11:30", "endTime":"12:30", "location":"UTHealth Houston, McGovern Medical School, MSB B.603 and via Microsoft Teams", "label":"Add to Calendar", "options":[ "Apple", "Google", "iCal", "Microsoft365", "MicrosoftTeams", "Yahoo" ], "timeZone":"America/Chicago", "trigger":"click", "inline":true, "listStyle":"modal", "iCalFileName":"Reminder-Event" }